External Speakers and Events Policy
Policy Statement
The School values open academic dialogue and public engagement as essential to education and research. This Policy establishes the framework and process for approving, managing, and reviewing all events and speaker activity conducted under the School’s name or auspices, whether on-site, online, or through partnerships. It ensures that the School meets its statutory duties under the Prevent Duty, the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, and the Equality Act 2010, by promoting lawful expression, safeguarding participants, and applying proportionate risk management. This Policy applies to all events organised by LSI students, staff, or affiliates — including those that are open to the public or a segment of the public, involve external speakers, or are delivered collaboratively with external organisations.
Principles
- Freedom of Speech: The School will take all reasonably practicable steps to secure lawful freedom of speech for students, staff, and visiting speakers.
- Academic Freedom: Staff and students may explore and debate lawful ideas, however controversial, with intellectual integrity and respect.
- Lawfulness: Events must comply with all relevant legislation, including counter-terrorism, equality, safeguarding, and data protection laws.
- Proportionality: Prevent and safeguarding measures will be applied relative to assessed risk.
- Neutrality: Approval decisions are made on procedural grounds, not viewpoint or ideology.
- Transparency: All approvals, mitigations, and decisions are recorded and traceable.
- Safeguarding: Participant welfare is a central consideration at every stage.
- Equality and Inclusion: The School ensures equal access and treatment across all events.
- Digital Responsibility: Online and hybrid events follow identical standards of approval and oversight.
- Governance and Accountability: Oversight is maintained through the Executive Committee, the Quality, Compliance and Audit Committee (QCA), and the Board of Governors. Ultimate accountability rests with the Board of Governors.
Regulatory Context
This Policy has been developed in line with the applicable laws, regulations, regulatory advice, and sector best practices, including the following:
Authority | Name | Url |
---|---|---|
UK Government |
Equality Act 2010
Equalities law to prohibit harassment and victimisation, and eliminate discrimination, including in the area of further and higher education, particularly with regards to specified personal characteristics. |
Redirect |
Office for Students |
Prevent duty: Framework for monitoring in higher education in England
The Prevent Duty: Framework for Monitoring in Higher Education in England sets out how the Office for Students ensures universities comply with their legal duty to prevent individuals being drawn into terrorism. It outlines expectations for governance, risk assessment, staff training, welfare support, and external speaker management, ensuring a proportionate, safeguarding-led approach across all registered higher education providers. |
Redirect |
UK Government |
Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015.
Compliance with the Prevent Duty under the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015. |
Redirect |
UK Government |
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023
The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 strengthens free speech protections in universities and colleges, requiring institutions and students’ unions to uphold lawful expression, prevent unlawful interference, and provide redress for breaches. |
Redirect |
UK Government |
Human Rights Act 1998
The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, ensuring public bodies respect individuals’ fundamental rights and allowing citizens to challenge violations in UK courts. |
Redirect |
Definitions and Coverage
This Policy applies to all events or meetings, including those involving external speakers, and those which are open to the public or to a segment of the public, whether held on School premises, online, or in collaboration with other organisations. This includes:
Oversight and controls for each category are applied proportionately, consistent with Prevent and Freedom of Speech duties. Clarifies the scope of the School’s responsibilities by distinguishing between internal, external, and collaborative activity. Ensures that Prevent oversight and risk assessment are applied proportionately, focusing on events with external involvement, public access, or identifiable safeguarding risk. |
Roles and Responsibilities
Operational management of event approvals is undertaken by the Student Success Team (SST), in collaboration with the Safeguarding and Prevent Leads (Designated Leads), and under the direction of the Director of Student Services. The Prevent Lead is one of the Designated Leads. The SST acts as the administrative hub for events, maintaining the Event Register and liaising with organisers, the Designated Leads, and the Director of Student Services as needed.
Establishes clear operational and governance lines of responsibility, ensuring proportionate risk review and senior oversight. |
Event Approval Process
All events falling within the Policy scope must be approved using the following steps: Step 1: Submission Event organisers must submit an Event Request Form on the AGS at least 10 working days before the planned event. The form includes:
Step 2: Initial Screening The SST checks the form for completeness, categorises the event type (internal, external, collaborative), and performs a preliminary risk screen on content sensitivity, audience, speaker profile. Low-risk internal events may be approved at this stage. All decisions are documented in the Event Register. Step 3: Safeguarding and Prevent Review Events identified as moderate or high risk are referred to Designated Leads for review, including the Prevent Lead. The Designated Leads may request additional information or mitigations (e.g., staff presence, limited recording, rephrasing of promotional material). The Designated Leads will inform the SST on necessary mitigations and compliance checks, which must be confirmed with the Designated Leads as acceptable before approval can be granted. All decisions are documented in the Event Register. The Designated Leads can advise the SST on whether an event should be classed as a high-risk escalation. Step 4: High-Risk Escalation All high-risk events must be referred to the Director of Student Services for decision. The Director must consult the Designated Leads. They may approve, conditionally approve, defer, or refuse the event. All decisions are documented in the Event Register. Step 5: Communication and Record The SST should notify the organiser in writing of the outcome and any conditions. All decisions are documented in the Event Register. A summary of decisions should be reported semesterly to the Executive Committee, Academic Board, and QCA Committee, and through them, to the Board of Governors. Provides a transparent, auditable, and proportionate procedural chain demonstrating effective internal control of event risk. |
Risk Assessment and Categorisation
Risk is assessed using an evidence-based matrix covering:
Events are categorised as:
For moderate and high-risk events, the SST must record the final risk category and mitigation plan in the Event Register, which are reviewed each semester. Ensures decisions are defensible, data-informed, and aligned with safeguarding and Prevent duty expectations. |
Escalation, Conduct, and Monitoring
If a new concern arises before or during an event, organisers must immediately inform the SST. For moderate-risk matters, the SST must refer to the Designated Leads, who must assess the concern and may suspend or terminate the event pending review. For all high-risk matters, the SST must refer to the Director of Student Services for a decision. All ongoing risks, decisions, and actions decisions must be recorded in the Event Register. Confirmed safeguarding or radicalisation concerns must be escalated in accordance with the Safeguarding and Prevent Policy. Ensures clear and immediate escalation of emerging risks before and during events, providing defined pathways for moderation, suspension, or termination where necessary. |
Provides live oversight to ensure that events proceed within approved safeguards and mitigations. |
Embeds post-event accountability and continuous improvement by ensuring all outcomes, incidents, and lessons learned are formally captured and reported through governance channels. |
Record Keeping, Training, and Review
The SST maintains a secure Event Register recording all requests, approvals, risk ratings, and actions for a minimum of two academic years. Ensures a transparent and auditable record of all event decisions, supporting regulatory compliance, internal assurance, and evidence-based reporting to governance bodies and external regulators. |
Annual reports summarising event activity and risk trends are submitted to the Executive Committee, QCA Committee, and Board of Governors. The Academic Board also receives a report on events and freedom of speech. Provides structured governance assurance and senior visibility of event management, freedom of speech, and Prevent compliance, ensuring accountability and continuous oversight at institutional level. |
The Designated Leads, including the Prevent Lead, review this Policy and the Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom Policy annually, taking into account new sector guidance, OfS feedback, and local risk intelligence, and recommend updates to the Director of Student Services for the Executive Committee. Supports continual enhancement of institutional controls by ensuring policies remain current with legislative change, OfS expectations, and evolving local risk context. |
All staff involved in organising or approving events must complete annual Prevent and Freedom of Speech training, coordinated by the People Team. Builds institutional capacity and shared understanding of legal duties, ensuring all staff are equipped to manage events responsibly and uphold freedom of speech and safeguarding obligations. |
The following metrics will be measured and regularly reviewed as key performance indicators for the School to ensure the effectiveness of this policy and associated operations.

Event Submission Compliance100% of external and collaborative events submitted to the SST via the Event Request Form before taking place. Confirms all relevant events are captured through the formal approval process, ensuring procedural traceability and Prevent oversight. |
Freedom of Speech AssuranceZero substantiated breaches of lawful freedom of speech recorded in the academic year. Confirms effective balancing of free-speech protections and Prevent safeguards through the School’s event approval and monitoring system. |
Governance Review and ReportingAnnual report on events and policy review completed and tabled at the Board of Governors by end of each academic year. Provides visible Board-level assurance that the policy remains effective, current, and aligned with OfS regulatory expectations. |
Risk Review and Documentation100% of moderate- and high-risk events reviewed by Designated Leads and Director of Student Services respectively and logged in the Event Register. Demonstrates consistent application of the School’s safeguarding and Prevent risk framework and evidences auditable senior review of higher-risk activity. |
Staff Training CompletionAt least 95% annual completion rate for training among staff involved in event organisation or approval. Ensures institutional competence and staff readiness to manage events lawfully, proportionately, and in accordance with statutory duties. |