LSI

External Speakers and Events Policy

Policy Statement

The School values open academic dialogue and public engagement as essential to education and research. This Policy establishes the framework and process for approving, managing, and reviewing all events and speaker activity conducted under the School’s name or auspices, whether on-site, online, or through partnerships. It ensures that the School meets its statutory duties under the Prevent Duty, the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, and the Equality Act 2010, by promoting lawful expression, safeguarding participants, and applying proportionate risk management. This Policy applies to all events organised by LSI students, staff, or affiliates — including those that are open to the public or a segment of the public, involve external speakers, or are delivered collaboratively with external organisations.

Principles

  • Freedom of Speech: The School will take all reasonably practicable steps to secure lawful freedom of speech for students, staff, and visiting speakers.
  • Academic Freedom: Staff and students may explore and debate lawful ideas, however controversial, with intellectual integrity and respect.
  • Lawfulness: Events must comply with all relevant legislation, including counter-terrorism, equality, safeguarding, and data protection laws.
  • Proportionality: Prevent and safeguarding measures will be applied relative to assessed risk.
  • Neutrality: Approval decisions are made on procedural grounds, not viewpoint or ideology.
  • Transparency: All approvals, mitigations, and decisions are recorded and traceable.
  • Safeguarding: Participant welfare is a central consideration at every stage.
  • Equality and Inclusion: The School ensures equal access and treatment across all events.
  • Digital Responsibility: Online and hybrid events follow identical standards of approval and oversight.
  • Governance and Accountability: Oversight is maintained through the Executive Committee, the Quality, Compliance and Audit Committee (QCA), and the Board of Governors. Ultimate accountability rests with the Board of Governors.

Regulatory Context

This Policy has been developed in line with the applicable laws, regulations, regulatory advice, and sector best practices, including the following:

Authority Name Url
UK Government Equality Act 2010
Equalities law to prohibit harassment and victimisation, and eliminate discrimination, including in the area of further and higher education, particularly with regards to specified personal characteristics.
Redirect
Office for Students Prevent duty: Framework for monitoring in higher education in England
The Prevent Duty: Framework for Monitoring in Higher Education in England sets out how the Office for Students ensures universities comply with their legal duty to prevent individuals being drawn into terrorism. It outlines expectations for governance, risk assessment, staff training, welfare support, and external speaker management, ensuring a proportionate, safeguarding-led approach across all registered higher education providers.
Redirect
UK Government Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015.
Compliance with the Prevent Duty under the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015.
Redirect
UK Government Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023
The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 strengthens free speech protections in universities and colleges, requiring institutions and students’ unions to uphold lawful expression, prevent unlawful interference, and provide redress for breaches.
Redirect
UK Government Human Rights Act 1998
The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, ensuring public bodies respect individuals’ fundamental rights and allowing citizens to challenge violations in UK courts.
Redirect

Definitions and Coverage

This Policy applies to all events or meetings, including those involving external speakers, and those which are open to the public or to a segment of the public, whether held on School premises, online, or in collaboration with other organisations. This includes:

  • Internal LSI Events – Organised and delivered exclusively by members of the LSI community (staff and/or students) without external speakers or contributors. These may be open solely to the LSI community or, where appropriate, to the public or a segment of the public. Routine internal teaching or professional activity does not normally require approval; however, where an internal event is open to the public, or presents a potential safeguarding or Prevent-related risk, it must follow the formal approval and risk assessment process outlined below.
  • External LSI Events – Organised by members of the LSI community that include one or more external speakers or contributors who are not members of LSI. These events, whether open to the LSI community or to the public, must follow formal approval and risk assessment in accordance with this Policy.
  • Collaborative Events – Hosted or co-organised by another organisation in which LSI staff or students participate, or which use LSI branding. These must follow the formal approval and risk assessment process outlined below.

Oversight and controls for each category are applied proportionately, consistent with Prevent and Freedom of Speech duties.

Clarifies the scope of the School’s responsibilities by distinguishing between internal, external, and collaborative activity. Ensures that Prevent oversight and risk assessment are applied proportionately, focusing on events with external involvement, public access, or identifiable safeguarding risk.

Roles and Responsibilities

Operational management of event approvals is undertaken by the Student Success Team (SST), in collaboration with the Safeguarding and Prevent Leads (Designated Leads), and under the direction of the Director of Student Services. The Prevent Lead is one of the Designated Leads. The SST acts as the administrative hub for events, maintaining the Event Register and liaising with organisers, the Designated Leads, and the Director of Student Services as needed.

  • The Event Organiser (staff or student) initiates the process by submitting an Event Request Form on the AGS.
  • The SST performs the initial procedural and risk completeness check.
  • The Designated Leads review medium- and high-risk cases, advise the SST on mitigations, and may consult external Prevent partners.
  • The Director of Student Services reviews any high-risk events from the SST, confirms final approval or refusal, and ensures accountability of all events to the Executive Committee and Quality, Compliance and Audit Committee (QCA), and ultimately, to the Board of Governors.

Establishes clear operational and governance lines of responsibility, ensuring proportionate risk review and senior oversight.

Event Approval Process

All events falling within the Policy scope must be approved using the following steps:

Step 1: Submission

Event organisers must submit an Event Request Form on the AGS at least 10 working days before the planned event. The form includes:

  • event purpose, title, format, and audience (including public);
  • speaker details (including all affiliations and background);
  • publicity materials and online links (where relevant);
  • proposed venue or platform;
  • expected attendance and any security arrangements.

Step 2: Initial Screening

The SST checks the form for completeness, categorises the event type (internal, external, collaborative), and performs a preliminary risk screen on content sensitivity, audience, speaker profile. Low-risk internal events may be approved at this stage. All decisions are documented in the Event Register.

Step 3: Safeguarding and Prevent Review

Events identified as moderate or high risk are referred to Designated Leads for review, including the Prevent Lead. The Designated Leads may request additional information or mitigations (e.g., staff presence, limited recording, rephrasing of promotional material). The Designated Leads will inform the SST on necessary mitigations and compliance checks, which must be confirmed with the Designated Leads as acceptable before approval can be granted. All decisions are documented in the Event Register. The Designated Leads can advise the SST on whether an event should be classed as a high-risk escalation.

Step 4: High-Risk Escalation

All high-risk events must be referred to the Director of Student Services for decision. The Director must consult the Designated Leads. They may approve, conditionally approve, defer, or refuse the event. All decisions are documented in the Event Register.

Step 5: Communication and Record

The SST should notify the organiser in writing of the outcome and any conditions. All decisions are documented in the Event Register. A summary of decisions should be reported semesterly to the Executive Committee, Academic Board, and QCA Committee, and through them, to the Board of Governors. 

Provides a transparent, auditable, and proportionate procedural chain demonstrating effective internal control of event risk.

Risk Assessment and Categorisation

Risk is assessed using an evidence-based matrix covering: 

  • Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom Policy
  • speaker or organisation background and affiliations;
  • subject matter sensitivity;
  • format and level of public access;
  • audience composition and venue security;
  • potential reputational or welfare concerns.

Events are categorised as:

  • Low Risk: Routine or internal activity, no indicators of concern.
  • Moderate Risk: Sensitive topics or public engagement requiring mitigations.
  • High Risk: Potential for legal, safeguarding, or Prevent-related issues.

For moderate and high-risk events, the SST must record the final risk category and mitigation plan in the Event Register, which are reviewed each semester.

Ensures decisions are defensible, data-informed, and aligned with safeguarding and Prevent duty expectations.

Escalation, Conduct, and Monitoring

If a new concern arises before or during an event, organisers must immediately inform the SST.

For moderate-risk matters, the SST must refer to the Designated Leads, who must assess the concern and may suspend or terminate the event pending review.

For all high-risk matters, the SST must refer to the Director of Student Services for a decision.

All ongoing risks, decisions, and actions decisions must be recorded in the Event Register.

Confirmed safeguarding or radicalisation concerns must be escalated in accordance with the Safeguarding and Prevent Policy.

Ensures clear and immediate escalation of emerging risks before and during events, providing defined pathways for moderation, suspension, or termination where necessary.

  • At least one designated member of the SST must be present at moderate or high-risk events.
  • All events must proceed within set parameters and mitigations (topic, audience, publicity).
  • For all fully online events, an authorised (trained) moderator approved by the SST must also be present.

Provides live oversight to ensure that events proceed within approved safeguards and mitigations.

  • The SST must log completion status and any incidents on the Event Register.
  • The Director of Student Services must report any escalations or lessons learned to the Executive Committee.

Embeds post-event accountability and continuous improvement by ensuring all outcomes, incidents, and lessons learned are formally captured and reported through governance channels.

Record Keeping, Training, and Review

The SST maintains a secure Event Register recording all requests, approvals, risk ratings, and actions for a minimum of two academic years.

Ensures a transparent and auditable record of all event decisions, supporting regulatory compliance, internal assurance, and evidence-based reporting to governance bodies and external regulators.

Annual reports summarising event activity and risk trends are submitted to the Executive Committee, QCA Committee, and Board of Governors. The Academic Board also receives a report on events and freedom of speech.

Provides structured governance assurance and senior visibility of event management, freedom of speech, and Prevent compliance, ensuring accountability and continuous oversight at institutional level.

The Designated Leads, including the Prevent Lead, review this Policy and the Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom Policy annually, taking into account new sector guidance, OfS feedback, and local risk intelligence, and recommend updates to the Director of Student Services for the Executive Committee.

Supports continual enhancement of institutional controls by ensuring policies remain current with legislative change, OfS expectations, and evolving local risk context.

All staff involved in organising or approving events must complete annual Prevent and Freedom of Speech training, coordinated by the People Team.

Builds institutional capacity and shared understanding of legal duties, ensuring all staff are equipped to manage events responsibly and uphold freedom of speech and safeguarding obligations.

The following metrics will be measured and regularly reviewed as key performance indicators for the School to ensure the effectiveness of this policy and associated operations.

Metrics and KPIs

Event Submission Compliance

Event Submission Compliance

100% of external and collaborative events submitted to the SST via the Event Request Form before taking place.
Confirms all relevant events are captured through the formal approval process, ensuring procedural traceability and Prevent oversight.

Freedom of Speech Assurance

Freedom of Speech Assurance

Zero substantiated breaches of lawful freedom of speech recorded in the academic year.
Confirms effective balancing of free-speech protections and Prevent safeguards through the School’s event approval and monitoring system.

Governance Review and Reporting

Governance Review and Reporting

Annual report on events and policy review completed and tabled at the Board of Governors by end of each academic year.
Provides visible Board-level assurance that the policy remains effective, current, and aligned with OfS regulatory expectations.

Risk Review and Documentation

Risk Review and Documentation

100% of moderate- and high-risk events reviewed by Designated Leads and Director of Student Services respectively and logged in the Event Register.
Demonstrates consistent application of the School’s safeguarding and Prevent risk framework and evidences auditable senior review of higher-risk activity.

Staff Training Completion

Staff Training Completion

At least 95% annual completion rate for training among staff involved in event organisation or approval.
Ensures institutional competence and staff readiness to manage events lawfully, proportionately, and in accordance with statutory duties.